Instead of pushing once a quarter, continuous integration, continuous delivery and testing make go-live another simple routine deployment. The more you can build and test during development, the less software engineers have to worry about pushing to production.

The logic behind this is simple but only came in response to problems in the traditional deployment cycle. With continuous integration, teams compile software and run it through a series of tests that mimic the production environment to ensure a successful build when pushed to production. Continuous integration is often combined with continuous delivery to achieve faster and more stable build processes with automation. That's TeamCity vs Jenkins in short but continue reading for a deep dive into continuous integration and why more and more software development teams are using these tools to speed up their release cycle.Ĭontinuous integration, source control and build management are formative concepts behind DevOps, driven by the need to regularly integrate new and change code in the master repository of version control systems like Github or Atlassian's Bitbucket. TeamCity is easier to configure and more straightforward to use, while Jenkins has a rich plugin ecosystem and integrations. Jenkins is an open source continuous integration tool, while TeamCity is a proprietary offering from JetBrains.

Download teamcity kubernetes